Faculty development program: Way to excellence
Abstract
Introduction: The importance of faculty development programs (FDP) to improve teaching effectiveness has been emphasized in recent years. Our endeavors to improve teaching ways at Shifa College of Medicine, include development of student feedback mechanisms, professional development programs, and research into teaching. New trends taking place in academic medicine were accommodated by modification of faculty development model.
Methods: With an aim to assess the perceptions of faculty about FDP at Shifa College of Medicine we gathered views of faculty, by administering questionnaire, conducting focus group and individual interviews.
Results: More than half of faculty (51%-83%) agreed with various items related to teaching and learning concepts, 79% believed that they learned assessment methods. 73% agreed that it was a source of introduction to new educational strategies. Sixty-eight percent agreed that FDP helped to improve skills in teaching of ethics and professionalism. Results of focus group discussion show that faculty found program helpful in their grooming and development and it made them more knowledgeable. Views from individual interviews stated that faculty development program has contributed towards learning.
Conclusion: In conclusion FDP at Shifa College of Medicine is valued by faculty. It has contributed towards excellence in teaching. This program should be continued with an endeavor to improve it further.
Downloads
References
Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No.8. Medical Teacher. 2006; 28:497-526.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590600902976
Kamel AM. Role of faculty development programs in improving teaching and learning. Saudi J Oral Sci. 2016; 3:61-68.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-6816.188073
Bligh J. Faculty development. Medical Education.2005; 39(20): 120-122.
Wilkerson LA, Irby DM. Strategies for improving teaching practices: A comprehensive approach to faculty development. Acad Med.1998; 73(4):387-96.
Cilliers FJ, Herman N. Impact of an educational development programme on teaching practice of academics at a research-intensive university. Int J Acad Dev. 2010; 15(3): 253-67.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2010.497698
Rowbotham MA. The Impact of Faculty Development on Teacher Self-Efficacy, Skills and Perspectives. Policy Research: IERC FFR 2015-1. Illinois Education Research Council. 2015.
Smyth R. Concepts of change: Enhancing the practice of academic staff development in higher education. Int J Acad Dev.2003; 8(1-2):51-60.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144042000277937
Light G, Calkins SC, Luna M, Drane DL. Assessing the Impact of a Year‐Long Faculty Development Program on Faculty Approaches to Teaching. Int. J. Technol. Learn. 2009; 20(2):168-181.
Bilal, Guraya SY, Chen S. The impact and effectiveness of faculty development program in fostering the faculty’s knowledge, skills, and professional competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019; 26(4):688-97.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.024
Skeff KM, Stratos G A, Mygdal W, Dewitt TA., Manfred L, Quirk M, et al. Faculty development. A resource for clinical teachers. J Gen Internal Med.1997; Suppl 2:S56-63.
Bhatnagar K, Srivastava K, Singh A. Is faculty development critical to enhance teaching effectiveness? Ind J Psychiat . 2010; 19(2):138-141.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.90349
Travis JE, Hursh D, Lankewicz G, Tang L. Monitoring the pulse of the faculty: Needs assessment in faculty development programs. To improve the academy. 1996; 15:95-113.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1996.tb00304.x
Trowbridge RL, Bates PW. A successful approach to faculty development at an independent academic medical center. Medical Teacher. 2008; 30(1)10-14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701753435
Cilliers FJ, Tekian A. Effective faculty development in an institutional context: designing for transfer. J Gra. Med Educ. 2016; 8:145-149.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-15-00117.1
Awan AK. Trading-off quality for quantity: Mushrooming of Medical Institutions and Quality of Medical Education in Pakistan. Int J Pathol. 2016; 14(1).
Srinivas DK, Adkoli BV. Faculty Development in Medical Education in India: The Need of the Day. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2009; 2(1):6-13.
Harden RM, Crosby J. AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer-the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical teacher. 2000; 22(4):334-47.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/014215900409429
Ramani S. Twelve tips to promote excellence in medical teaching. Medical Teacher. 2006; 28 (1):19-23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500441786
Licari FW. Faculty development to support curriculum change and ensure the future vitality of dental education. J Dent Edu. 2007; 71(12):1509-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2007.71.12.tb04427.x
Singh T, Bansal P, Sharma M. A need and necessity for faculty development: the role of medical education units in the Indian context. South East Asian J Med Educ. 2008; 2(1):2-6.
Birden H, Glass N, Wilson I, Harrison M, Usherwood T, Nass D. Teaching professionalism in medical education: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 25. Medical Teacher. 2013; 35(7):e1252-66.
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University (JSTMU) is the owner of all copyright to any work published in the journal. Any material printed in JSTMU may not be reproduced without the permission of the editors or publisher. The Journal accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing and/or decision in this journal. The Editorial Board makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in the journal. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Board or JSTMU.
Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.