Cardiac implantable electronic device related chest pain: A focused review
Abstract
More than 600,000 patients undergo cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation in a year, which comprise of pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRT). The most common symptom experienced after a CIED implantation is chest pain. In this review, we describe CIED implantation and associated complications causing chest pain.
Downloads
References
Harding ME. Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: Intraoperative, Acute, and Remote Complications. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2015; 26(4):312-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCI.0000000000000112
Lee JH, Lee SR, Choi EK, et al. Temporal Trends of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantations: a Nationwide Population-based Study. Korean Circ J. 2019; 49(9):841-852.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2018.0444
Malik AA, Malik J. Finders Keepers: A Case of the Rogue Pacing Wire. Cureus. 2020; 12(8):e9823.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9823
Kiviniemi MS, Pirnes MA, Eränen HJ, Kettunen RV, Hartikainen JE. Complications related to permanent pacemaker therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999; 22(5):711-20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00534.x
Silva KR, Albertini CM, Crevelari ES, Carvalho EI, Fiorelli AI, Martinelli Filho M, et al. Complications after Surgical Procedures in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Results of a Prospective Registry. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016; 107(3):245-56.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20160129
Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, Underwood DA, Gates KB, Topol EJ, et al. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334(8):481-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199602223340801
Lim WY, Prabhu S, Schilling RJ. Implantable Cardiac Electronic Devices in the Elderly Population. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2019; 8(2):143-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2019.3.4
Becker DE, Reed KL. Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology. Anesth Prog. 2006; 53(3):98-110.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006(2006)53[98:EOLAP]2.0.CO;2
Javed N, Malik J. Access times for supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches of subclavian vein catheterization in pacemaker insertion. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2020; 14(3):14-17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2019.3.4
Aktaa S, Fatania K, Gains C, White H. Chest pain following permanent pacemaker insertion… a case of pneumopericardium due to atrial lead perforation. BMJ Case Rep. 2018; 2018:bcr2018226318.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2018-226318
Gunda S, Reddy M, Pillarisetti J, Atoui M, Badhwar N, Swarup V, et al. Differences in complication rates between large bore needle and a long micropuncture needle during epicardial access: time to change clinical practice?. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015; 8(4):890-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002921
Aktaa S, Fatania K, Gains C, White H. Chest pain following permanent pacemaker insertion… a case of pneumopericardium due to atrial lead perforation. BMJ Case Rep. 2018; 2018:bcr2018226318.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2018-226318
Shih SY, Hu SY, Tsan YT, Lin TC. Spontaneous hemomediastinum and hemothorax caused by ruptured bronchial artery aneurysm. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35(6):1076.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.02.040
Tagliari AP, Kochi AN, Mastella B, Saadi RP, di Leoni Ferrari A, Dussin LH, et al. Ultrasound-guided Axillary Vein Puncture in Cardiac Lead Implantation: Time to Move to a New Standard Access?. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev.2020; 9(2):78-82.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2020.17
Thomas JB, Antiga L, Che SL, Milner JS, Hangan Steinman DA, Spence JD, et al. Variation in the carotid bifurcation geometry of young versus older adults: implications for geometric risk of atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2005; 36(11):2450-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000185679.62634.0a
James HA, Wan SH, Wylam ME. Delayed post-operative cardiac tamponade manifesting as cardiogenic shock. J Cardiol Cases. 2013; 8(6):195-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jccase.2013.08.005
Goyle KK, Walling AD. Diagnosing pericarditis. Am Fam Physician. 2002; 66(9):1695-1702.
Provaznik Z, Holzamer A, Camboni D, Rupprecht L, Resch M, Wittmann S, et al. Perforation of myocardial wall and great vessels after cardiovascular interventions-a 5-year analysis. J Thorac Dis. 2017; 9(12):5288-94.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.113
Baman T, Latchamsetty R, Oral H. Complications of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. J Atr Fibrillation. 2011; 4(3):345.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.345
Jumper N, Radotra I, Witt P, Campbell NG, Mishra A. Brachial plexus impingement secondary to implantable cardioverter defibrillator: A case report [published online ahead of print, 2019 Apr 26]. Arch Plast Surg. 2019; 46(6):594-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.01158
Harcombe AA, Newell SA, Ludman PF, et al. Late complications following permanent pacemaker implantation or elective unit replacement. Heart. 1998; 80(3):240-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.80.3.240
Shittu M, Shah P, Elkhalili W, et al. A Rare Case of Recurrent Pacemaker Allergic Reaction. Heart Views. 2015; 16(2):59-61.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-705X.159222
Mahapatra S, Bybee KA, Bunch TJ, Espinosa RE, Sinak LJ, McGoon MD, et al. Incidence and predictors of cardiac perforation after permanent pacemaker placement. Heart Rhythm. 2005; 2(9):907-11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.06.011
Citro R, Lyon AR, Meimoun P, Omerovic E, Redfors B, Buck T, et al. Standard and advanced echocardiography in takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy: clinical and prognostic implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 28(1):57-74.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.08.020
Postema PG, Wiersma JJ, van der Bilt IA, Dekkers P, van Bergen PF. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy shortly following pacemaker implantation-case report and review of the literature. Neth Heart J. 2014; 22(10):456-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-012-0320-8
Jefferies JL, Younis GA, Flamm SD, Rasekh A, Massumi A. Chest pain and diaphragmatic pacing after pacemaker implantation. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005; 32(1):106-7.
Shah R, Qualls Z. Diaphragmatic stimulation caused by cardiac resynchronization treatment. CMAJ. 2016; 188(10):E239.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.150986
Chao JA, Firstenberg MS. Delayed pacemaker lead perforations: Why unusual presentations should prompt an early multidisciplinary team approach. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017; 7(1):65-68.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.201951
Ibrahim M, Hasan R. Pacemaker-mediated angina. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2013; 18(1):35-7.
Duray GZ, Israel CW, Wegener FT, Hohnloser SH. Tachycardia after pacemaker implantation in a patient with complete atrioventricular block. Europace. 2007; 9(10):900-3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eum079
Alasti M, Machado C, Rangasamy K, Bittinger L, Healy S, Kotschet E, et al. Pacemaker-mediated arrhythmias. J Arrhythm. 2018; 34(5):485-92.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12098
Khan AH. The postcardiac injury syndromes. Clin Cardiol. 1992; 15(2):67-72.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960150203
Bucekova E, Simkova I, Hulman M. Postpericardiotomy syndrome - post-cardiac injury syndrome. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2012; 113(8):481-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4149/bll_2012_106
Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54(9):764-76.
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University (JSTMU) is the owner of all copyright to any work published in the journal. Any material printed in JSTMU may not be reproduced without the permission of the editors or publisher. The Journal accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing and/or decision in this journal. The Editorial Board makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in the journal. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Board or JSTMU.
Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.