Prespective of medical students towards experimental biochemistry
Objective: The simple curriculum of Medical science has the complex biochemical theories which are hard to grasp. To address this problem, practical knowledge and change in approach to study is relevant to have a better foundation in clinical years; where this information has to be applied.
Methodology: Modifications were made in experimental biochemistry and genetics to focus on more applied knowledge through experiments and problem-based learning. A seven-item questionnaire to check the students’ perspective of biochemistry was distributed among second year students, 89 out of 104 responded.
Results: 42 were males and 47 were females. The results were positive between 60% and 70% for all the items. 70% was highest, which was for component, which they still hope for better courses in the future.
Conclusion: Numerous strategies have been applied to promote teaching results and increase the effectiveness of teaching to undergraduate clinical students in biochemistry.
Afshar M, Han Z. Teaching and learning medical biochemistry: perspectives from a student and an educator. Med Sci Edu. 2014; 24(3):339-41.
Yu L, Yi S, Zhai J, Wang Z. Approaches to enhance the teaching quality of experimental biochemistry for MBBS students in TSMU, China. Bioch Molec Bio Edu. 2017; 45(4):360-4.
Noble D. Differential and integral views of genetics in computational systems biology. Interface Focus. 2010; 1(1):7-15.
Watmough S, O'Sullivan H, Taylor D. Graduates from a traditional medical curriculum evaluate the effectiveness of their medical curriculum through interviews. BMC Med Edu. 2009; 9(1):64.
Clack GB. Medical graduates evaluate the effectiveness of their education. Med Edu. 1994; 28(5):418-31.
Wolyniak MJ, Bemis LT, Prunuske AJ. Improving medical students’ knowledge of genetic disease: a review of current and emerging pedagogical practices. Adv Med Edu Pract. 2015; 6:597.
Leung WC. Competency based medical training. Bri Med J. 2002; 325(7366):693.
McRae MP. Using clinical case studies to teach biochemistry in a doctoral program: a descriptive paper. Creative Edu. 2012; 3(7):1173.
Hatala R, Guyatt G. Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine. J. Ami Med Ass. 2002; 288(9):1110-2.
Brown JA. Evaluating the effectiveness of a practical inquiry‐based learning bioinformatics module on undergraduate student engagement and applied skills. Bio Mole Bio Edu. 2016; 44(3):304-13.
Gupta S, Gupta AK, Verma M, Kaur H, Kaur A, Singh K. The attitudes and perceptions of medical students towards basic science subjects during their clinical years: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2014; 4(1):16.
Alam A. How do medical students in their clinical years perceive basic sciences courses at King Saud University?. Ann Saudi Med. 2011; 31(1):58-61.
Yu L, Yi S, Zhai J, Wang Z. Approaches to enhance the teaching quality of experimental biochemistry for MBBS students in TSMU, China. Bioch Mol Bio Educ. 2017; 45(4):360-4.
Purl D. SIS (Structured Interactive Sessions): These are UNCLE (Unconventional learning exercises): 2002; 17(2):52-9.
Nair SP, Shah T, Seth S, Pandit N, Shah GV. Case based learning: a method for better understanding of biochemistry in medical students. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2013; 7(8):1576.
Yan Q, Ma L, Zhu L, Zhang W. Learning effectiveness and satisfaction of international medical students: Introducing a Hybrid–PBL curriculum in biochemistry. Bioch Mol Biol Edu. 2017; 45(4):336-42.
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University (JSTMU) is the owner of all copyright to any work published in the journal. Any material printed in JSTMU may not be reproduced without the permission of the editors or publisher. The Journal accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing and/or decision in this journal. The Editorial Board makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in the journal. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Board or JSTMU.
Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.